Three Kings at Corus, the first Major of the year
 The
2007 edition of the traditional Corus Chess tournament finished in a troika of winners, with a tree-way tie between Aronian, Topalov and Radjabov, all on 8.5/13.
As is tradition at Wijk an Zee, all three players were proclaimed winners with no tiebreak applied.
Of the three, Armenian GM Levon Aronian (2744) was the only undefeated player. He managed to win four games, one of them against Radjabov, and tied the rest, for a total rating performance
of 2826. He benefited from the draw between Radjabov and Topalov on the final day, as he defeated Tiviakov to tie for first place.
Video interview |
|
After their big video coverage of the Corus Chess Tournament, Chessvibes have published another great new video. This week they had an interview with ex-world champion Anatoly Karpov. Interestingly, the questions
were put forward in advance by Chessvibes visitors. Check it out at Chessvibes website.
|
Bulgarian GM Veselin Topalov (2783), now fully rested and recovered from his Elista match against Kramnik, and also his bad tournament at Essent, was back to his aggressive best. Like Radjabov,
he scored heavily against the worse performers in the tournament (Shirov, Carlsen and van Wely), and also defeated top class players such as Anand and Ponomariov.
However, Topalov wouldn't be Topalov without a mishap along the way, and the Bulgarian ace (who had a final rating performance of 2823) lost a game he perhaps should have won - against Svidler - when
he had the sole lead; a result that blew the tournament wide open going into the final rounds.
Finally, young Azeri GM Teimour Radjabov (2729) played arguably the best tournament of his career so far and made all the running from the off with a start of 4.5/5 against the weakest players.
His outstanding result with the King's Indian as Black (3.5/4) helped him largely to achieve this result. His only loss was against another of the winners, Aronian. All in all he can be very pleased with his result.
The other undefeated player in the event was World Champion Vladimir Kramnik (2766). Kramnik played in his usual solid style, alternating many quick draws, especially with Black, with
his famous "squeezes" with White. He played some very nice games, attacking chess against van Wely, and a nice positional game against Vishy Anand. He finished in fourth place with 5/13 and a 2795 performance
rating.
The other two players with a plus score were Indian GM Vishy Anand (7.5/13) and Russian GM Peter Svidler (7/13). With his result, Anand loses few rating points while Svidler wins
some. Anand started the tournament very well but then lost two games with Black against Kramnik and Topalov that put him back into the middle of the pack. Svidler played the event the
other way round: after a slow start he began a comeback that included his win against Topalov, but finally he lost his last two games to Karjakin and van Wely to drop back down the standings table.

Press conference after Radjabov-Topalov (1/2) Photo: © Fred Lucas - Momentoo
With a 50% score, we find young Czech Rep. GM David Navara, who played very well with Black (holding Topalov, Anand and Kramnik to a draw) but with
White made too many mistakes. The other player with 6.5/13 was Ukrainian teenager Sergei Karjakin who had a solid tournament with a performance rating 43 points higher than his actual rating.
All the rest of the players finished with minus scores and lost rating points. The event was especially disastrous for Latvian-born Spaniard Alexei Shirov (2715), who clearly had too many bad days at
the office with a lowly TPR of 2608. He only won one game (against Navara, with Black) and lost five - and in successive rounds after a first round draw! Shirov was clearly out of form by his own
standards, and at the end might just have been happy to have finished on 4/7 to share last place with Carlsen.
In the B-group, the winner was Ukranian GM Pavel Eljanov (2675) who now qualifies to play next year in the 2008 A-group. Eljanov scored 9/13, taking the title a full
point ahead of Armenian Gabriel Sargissian (2658), China's Bu Xiangzhi (2644), Russian GM Dmitry Jakovenko (2691) and French hope Maxime Vachier-Lagrave (2573), all on 8/13.
Finally, Polish veteran GM Michal Krasenkow (2651) was the surprise winner of the C-group - but not because of his strength, as he was the top seed, but because he overtook the leader in the last round
to clinch the title. New Russian whiz Ian Nepomniachtchi (2587) looked to be running away with the tournament by leading from the first round, only to lose in the final round with White against Nadezha Kosintseva.
| GROUP-A | Final STANDINGS after round-13 |
| Nº |
FLAG |
NAME |
Age |
FIDE |
Rk |
FED |
PTS |
| 1 |
 |
GM Veselin Topalov |
31 |
2783 |
1 |
BUL |
8.5 |
| - |
 |
GM Levon Aronian |
24 |
2744 |
7 |
ARM |
8.5 |
| - |
 |
GM Teymour Radjabov |
19 |
2729 |
11 |
AZE |
8.5 |
| 4 |
 |
GM Vladimir Kramnik |
31 |
2766 |
3 |
RUS |
8.0 |
| 5 |
 |
GM Viswanathan Anand |
37 |
2779 |
2 |
IND |
7.5 |
| 6 |
 |
GM Peter Svidler |
30 |
2728 |
12 |
RUS |
7.0 |
| 7 |
 |
GM Sergey Karjakin |
17 |
2678 |
29 |
UKR |
6.5 |
| - |
 |
GM David Navara |
21 |
2719 |
15 |
CZE |
6.5 |
| 9 |
 |
GM Ruslan Ponomariov |
23 |
2723 |
14 |
UKR |
6.0 |
| 10 |
 |
GM Loek van Wely |
34 |
2683 |
26 |
NED |
5.0 |
| - |
 |
GM Sergey Tiviakov |
33 |
2682 |
27 |
NED |
5.0 |
| 12 |
 |
GM Alexander Motylev |
27 |
2647 |
58 |
RUS |
5.0 |
| 13 |
 |
GM Alexey Shirov |
34 |
2715 |
17 |
ESP |
4.5 |
| - |
 |
GM Magnus Carlsen |
16 |
2690 |
24 |
NOR |
4.5 |
|
Related information
- You can get more information in the ICC LIVE COVERAGE and ICC Webcast webpages.
- To watch the archived games, connect to ICC and type "lib Corus07".
- More information regarding the event can be found on the official Corus 2007 website.
- Video coverage of Corus 2007 from ChessVibes.com.
- Photo gallery of Corus 2007 by Fred Lucas - Momentoo.
- Download PGN of Corus 2007 Group-A from TWIC.
|
![Corus R-13 -> Radjabov (2729) - Topalov (2783) [E08] 1/2](http://www.chessclub.com/xid/$mling$/$id/images/main/corus07r13_1_200x200.gif) |
Position after 21...dxe3! |
Radjabov, Teimour (2729) - Topalov, Veselin (2783) [E08]
Corus Chess 2007 Wijk aan Zee (13), 2007
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.g3 Bb4+ 5.Bd2 Be7 6.Bg2 0-0 7.0-0 c6 8.Bf4 Nbd7 9.Qc2 a5 10.Rd1 Nh5 11.Bc1 b5 Topalov doesn't repeat moves with 11...Nhf6 12.cxd5
cxd5 13.e4 A necessary rupture, as otherwise the white queen is badly placed on c2. 13...dxe4 14.Qxe4 Rb8 15.Qe2 Nhf6 16.Bf4 Rb6 17.Ne5 Nd5 18.Bxd5 exd5 19.Nc3 So far so theory... 19...Nxe5!?N Topalov's
new move! [19...Nf6 20.Nxb5 Ba6 21.a4 Ne4 22.Rdc1 Qe8 23.Rc7 Bd8 24.Ra7 f6 25.Nd7 Rf7 26.Nxb6 Rxa7 27.Nxd5 Rd7 28.Ndc3 Rxd4 29.Re1 f5 30.Qc2 Rb4 31.Nd5 Rxb5 32.axb5 Qxb5 33.Nc7 Qc4 34.Qd1 Bxc7 35.Qd7 h6 36.Qxc7 Qb4 37.Qb8+ Qxb8 38.Bxb8 Nd2 39.Ra1
g5 40.f4 Nb3 41.Ra3 Bc4 42.Bc7 g4 43.Bxa5 1-0 Kramnik,V-Topalov,V/Elista 2006.] 20.dxe5 The best option. [20.Bxe5 b4|^; 20.Qxe5 Be6 with the idea ...b4.] 20...d4! Black is trying to activate all his pieces, especially
the bishop on c8. 21.Be3 White chooses an option that seems to put Black against the ropes but the Bulgarian GM has everything under control.. [21.Nxb5 Ba6 (21...Qd5 22.Nxd4 Bb7 23.f3 Bc5 24.Be3 Qxe5 25.Qf2 Re8©) 22.a4
Qd5 23.Nc7 Qh1+ 24.Kxh1 Bxe2 25.Rxd4 Bf3+ 26.Kg1 Rxb2+/=] 21...dxe3! 22.Qxe3 A correct decision that equalizes but capturing the queen was clearly the critical move. Maybe this queen sacrifice surprised Radjabov and he preferred
not to risk. [22.Rxd8 exf2+ 23.Qxf2 Bxd8 24.Nd5 Rc6 25.Rd1 This is dangerous because of the many diagonals for the bishop but it may be playable for White.] 22...Bg5[] [22...Bd7 23.Rxd7 Qxd7 24.Qxb6+/-] 23.Qc5[] [23.f4?
Bxf4! 24.Qxf4 (24.gxf4? Rg6+-/+) 24...Qe8=/+] 23...Be7 The draw is forced. 24.Qe3 Bg5 25.Qc5 Be7 26.Qe3 A great game that ends in a logical draw in view of what happened on the board. 1/2-1/2 |

![Corus R-13 -> van Wely, Loek (2683) - Svidler, Peter (2728) [D87] 1-0](http://www.chessclub.com/xid/$mling$/$id/images/main/corus07r13_2_200x200.gif) |
Position after: 19.Rc5! |
van Wely, Loek (2683) - Svidler, Peter (2728) [D87]
Corus Chess 2007 Wijk aan Zee (13), 2007
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 d5 4.cxd5 Nxd5 5.e4 Nxc3 6.bxc3 Bg7 7.Bc4 c5 8.Ne2 Nc6 9.Be3 0-0 10.0-0 Bd7 11.Rb1 Qc7 12.Bf4!? [An earlier game went 12.Bd3 Rad8 13.Bf4 Qc8 14.d5 Ne5 15.Bxe5 Bxe5 16.f4 Bg7 17.c4 e6 18.f5
exf5 19.exf5 b5 20.f6 Bh6 21.Nc3 bxc4 22.Bxc4 Bf5 23.Bd3 Bg4 24.Be2 Bf5 25.Bd3 Bg4 26.Be2 Bf5 1/2-1/2 Shirov,A-Svidler,P/Wijk aan Zee NED 2007.] 12...Qc8 [If 12...e5 13.dxe5 Nxe5 14.Bd5+/=] 13.Rc1 [Alternatively 13.d5 Na5 14.Bd3
e5 15.Bg3 f5 16.f4 fxe4 17.Bxe4 Nc4 18.Qd3 Nd6 19.fxe5 Nxe4 20.Qxe4 Bf5 21.Qc4 Bxb1 22.d6+ Kh8 23.Rxb1 Qf5 24.Re1 Bxe5 25.Nd4 Bxd4+ 26.cxd4 Rae8 27.Rxe8 Rxe8-+ Carlsen,M-Navara,D/Wijk aan Zee 2007] 13...a6N A novelty, although quite logical. [13...Rd8
14.d5 Ne5 15.Bxe5 Bxe5 16.f4 Bg7 17.Qb3 Rb8 18.a4 b6 19.e5 Be8 20.Ng3 a6 21.Rcd1 b5 22.axb5 axb5 23.Be2 Qb7 24.Bf3 Qb6 25.Kh1 f6 26.Rfe1 fxe5 27.fxe5 Kh8 28.Ne4 Bxe5 1/2-1/2 Rodshtein,M-Huzman,A/Ashdod 2004] 14.Qd2 b5 15.Bd3 Qb7 16.Bh6 Bxh6? Clearly
a bad move. [Better was 16...Rfd8 although White is better] 17.Qxh6-> cxd4?! [17...c4 18.Bb1 e5 19.d5+/=] 18.cxd4 Qb6 19.Rc5! Bg4 [19...Nxd4 20.Rh5!! Nxe2+ 21.Bxe2+-] 20.Nf4!+- Nxd4 [20...Nb4 21.Nh5] 21.Rg5 Bf3
22.Rg3 [22.e5 was also very strong, with a subsequent sacrifice on g6.] 1-0 |
|
Lesson by IM Angel Martín
 Angel
Martín is an International Master from Spain. He's a former four-time Spanish Champion and Assistant Manager of the Spanish chess magazine Peón de Rey. Proof-reading and translations
to English was prepared by International Master, Michael Rahal.
Concentration of attacking pieces
When attacking the castled king different factors must be taken into account, such as the creation and use of the weaknesses. But the relationship between attacking and defending forces is also very important. When one side
has a piece superiority on the kingside (under the supposition that both players have castled kingside) and his opponent has trouble bringing over his defending pieces from the other side of the board, the attack has many chances of getting
through. An exchange of pieces can even be good for the attacker, so long as he maintains his superiority.
The following game is a classic example. White concentrates the majority of his pieces on his opponents castled king, whereas Black, after a few careless moves, isolates his own pieces on the queenside; especially the most
important one, the queen.
Botvinnik, M - Chekhover, V [A13]
Moscow, 1935
1.Nf3 d5 2.c4 e6 3.b3 Nf6 4.Bb2 Be7 5.e3 [This idea became popular after Nimzowitsch played it and that is why it bears his name. The alternative is 5.g3] 5...0–0 6.Be2 c6 [Black defines
his pawn structure, although he could have waited a bit longer with 6...Nbd7 or 6...b6 keeping open the option ...c5.] 7.0–0 Nbd7 8.Nc3 a6 [To play ...b5. The alternative 8...b6 is less logical when Black has already decided
to play c6.] 9.Nd4 [Avoiding ...b5 and angling for f2-f4. Another possibility is 9.d4 b5 10.Qc2 with the idea 11.e4. Black should probably avoid this move by playing 10...b4 11.Na4 Bb7] 9...dxc4 [9...c5 seemed
more logical, opposing White's plans. If then 10.Nc2 Nb6 11.cxd5 Nbxd5] 10.bxc4 Nc5 [Now 10...c5 would give White more options than before, but even so it seems to be playable.] 11.f4
![Botvinnik, M - Chekhover, V [A13] (1-0) diagram-1](http://www.chessclub.com/xid/$mling$/$id/mailing/2007/02a/diag1.gif)
[Otherwise Black would play...e5, now that the knight can't leap to f5.] 11...Qc7 12.Nf3 Rd8 13.Qc2 [Better than 13.d4 as the black knight would jump to e4.] 13...Ncd7 14.d4 c5 15.Ne5 b6 16.Bd3 cxd4 [Better
than 16...Bb7 which would be answered by 17.d5! and if 17...exd5 18.Nxd5 with an advantage for White.] 17.exd4 Bb7
![Botvinnik, M - Chekhover, V [A13] (1-0) diagram-2](http://www.chessclub.com/xid/$mling$/$id/mailing/2007/02a/diag2.gif)
[Both sides have developed their pieces reasonably, although White has more space and dominates the center thanks to his "hanging pawns" on c4 and d4. In an ending they may be weak, but in the middle game they are a dangerous
weapon. White's plan must be the attack on the kingside and this following moves are directed towards this aim.] 18.Qe2 Nf8 [Obviously against 18...Nxe5 then 19.fxe5 and Black is in deep trouble. But he has a piece sacrifice
19...Rxd4! and if 20.exf6 Bc5 with dangerous threats, as 21.Kh1 Rh4 with a mating attack, and 21.Rf2 Rh4 22.h3 Qg3. White must play 20.Nb5 axb5 21.Bxd4 bxc4 22.exf6 cxd3 23.Qxd3 Bd6; or 20.Nd5 Rxd5 21.cxd5 Bc5+ 22.Kh1 Nxd5, but Black has a satisfactory
position in both cases.]
|

|
|

|
19.Nd1 [Apart from defending the d4 pawn, this the beginning of a knight tour that brings another piece into the fray.] 19...Ra7?! [Too slow. Preferable was 19...Ng6 and it wouldn't
be so easy for White to mobilize his d1 knight as 20.Nf2 isn't possible because f4 would be left undefended, while 20.Ne3 is answered by 20...Be4] 20.Nf2 Qb8 [While White is pushing his pieces towards the kingside, Black is unnecessarily
taking them away. 20...Ng6 was the best move, although already White can answer with 21.Nh3] 21.Nh3
![Botvinnik, M - Chekhover, V [A13] (1-0) diagram-3](http://www.chessclub.com/xid/$mling$/$id/mailing/2007/02a/diag3.gif)
[Now, White has all his pieces except the a1-rook concentrated on his opponent's kingside, whereas his opponent has fewer pieces defending.] 21...h6 [This move doesn't avoid the knight jump to g5, so therefore
it is a bad move. Possibly the best move was 21...N6d7 22.Qh5 g6 with some resistance.] 22.Ng5! [With this sacrifice White opens a gap in his opponent's castled king position. In view of the sacrifices on the f7 square, Black
has no choice.] 22...hxg5 23.fxg5 N8d7 [Probably the best, as if 23...N6h7 24.Nxf7 Nxg5 25.Qh5 Ngh7 26.Nh6+ gxh6 27.Bxh7+ Kxh7 28.Qf7+ Kh8 29.d5+ e5 30.Qxe7 winning.] 24.Nxf7!? [Another piece sacrifice that exposes
the black king even more. However, the simple 24.Nxd7 Nxd7 25.Rxf7! was stronger, as if 25...Kxf7 26.Qh5+ winning, for example: 26...Kg8 27.Qh7+ Kf8 28.Qh8+ Kf7 29.g6+ Kf6 30.Qh4#] 24...Kxf7 25.g6+
![Botvinnik, M - Chekhover, V [A13] (1-0) diagram-4](http://www.chessclub.com/xid/$mling$/$id/mailing/2007/02a/diag4.gif)
25...Kg8? [After this move, White's attack develops strongly. Also bad was 25...Ke8? 26.Qxe6 Nf8 27.Qf7+ Kd7 28.Bf5+ winning. The only move was 25...Kf8! offering a better defense. Play could continue 26.Qxe6
Ne5! with the idea 27.dxe5 Bc5+ 28.Kh1 Bxg2+ 29.Kxg2 Rxd3 and Black defends. A better try is 27.Rxf6+!? gxf6 28.Qh3 with big complications. Botvinnik suggested here 28...Bb4, but 29.Rf1 gives White strong threats. Better is 28...Bc5 29.Rf1 (29.Bf5!?
is also to be considered) 29...Qd6 30.dxc5 Qxc5+ 31.Rf2 Rxd3 (31...Qxf2+ 32.Kxf2 Nxd3+ 33.Kg3!? Nxb2 34.Qh6+ Ke7 35.Qe3+ Kf8 36.Qxb6 Rd3+ 37.Kh4 with advantage for White.) 32.Qh8+ Ke7 33.Qxf6+ Kd7 34.Qf5+ Ke8 35.Qe6+ Qe7 and Black consolidates
his advantage. But White could play even stronger: 27.Qh3! (with the threat 28.dxe5) 27...Nf7 (27...Nf3+ suggested by Vukovic, isn't enough because of 28.Rxf3 Bxf3 29.Qh8+ Ng8 30.Rf1) 28.gxf7 Bc8 (28...Kxf7 29.Qh7!) 29.Qh8+ Kxf7 30.Qh5+ (30.Qh7!?)
30...Kg8 (30...Kf8 31.Bg6 Be6 32.Rxf6+ Bxf6 33.Ba3+ Rd6 34.Re1 Ke7 35.d5!+- Vukovic) 31.Rxf6! Bxf6 (31...gxf6 32.Qg6+ Kf8 33.Bc1!+-) 32.Bh7+ Kf8 33.Ba3+ Re7 (33...Rd6 34.Qd5) 34.Bg6 Be6 35.Re1 (with the idea Rxe6. Also winning is the direct 35.Qh8+
Bg8 36.Rf1 Rd6 37.Bh7 Kf7 38.Bxd6) 35...Qc8 36.Qh8+ Bg8 37.Bxe7+ Bxe7 38.Rf1+ Bf6 39.Rxf6+ followed by mate.] 26.Qxe6+ Kh8 27.Qh3+ Kg8 28.Bf5 Nf8 29.Be6+ Nxe6 30.Qxe6+ Kh8 31.Qh3+ Kg8
![Botvinnik, M - Chekhover, V [A13] (1-0) diagram-5](http://www.chessclub.com/xid/$mling$/$id/mailing/2007/02a/diag5.gif)
32.Rxf6! [After this forced move sequence White eliminates Black's best defender. Even though a defender disappears for an attacker, the stronger side replaces the exchanged piece for another rook. Black doesn't
have this option in hand.] 32...Bxf6 33.Qh7+ Kf8 34.Re1 [Cutting off the escape route. Black has no defense.] 34...Be5 35.Qh8+ Ke7 36.Qxg7+ Kd6 37.Qxe5+ Kd7 38.Qf5+ Kc6 39.d5+ Kc5 40.Ba3+ Kxc4 41.Qe4+ Kc3 42.Bb4+ Kb2 43.Qb1#
1–0
|
|
ICC
Quiz #2662
submitted by Chessguy

White mates in 3

To play this puzzle on the ICC type:
tell trainingbot number 2662
Then type: play trainingbot
| 
|
| 
| ICC
Quiz #2726
submitted by claymore

White mates in 2

To play this puzzle on the ICC type:
tell trainingbot number 2726
Then type: play trainingbot
|
Political Chess

This brand new set is sure to be popular amongst those of you who have always wanted to checkmate George Bush, set up phalanxes of Sharons or fianchetto your Kim Jong IIs! A
great idea for a Christmas gift or showpiece in any living room.
The pieces are made of high quality porcelain. Each piece is hand painted and given a glaze finishing. The crowns of the kings and queens are painted with real gold. (One week for delivery).
Price $499.00 - Buy
now!

How to Reassess Your Chess – Jeremy Silman
Review
by GM Joel Benjamin:
Although I've heard good things about How to Reassess Your Chess, I never read the first edition of this book. The author told me that a great deal of new material is included in the third edition. That's refreshing,
considering how many books are passed off as new editions with only the slightest changes made.
Writing a book of instruction is a lot harder than many people think. The author must identify and explain a number of concepts that often come naturally to him. Silman rises to that challenge, offering the most
comprehensive and logically presented instructional book I have ever seen. He goes beyond presenting examples of bad bishops, weak pawns, open files, etc. Silman teaches the reader to think like a master.
Price $17.95 - Buy
now!
|

|
|

|
Caro-Kann Defence: Panov Attack - Karpov & Podgaets
The Caro-Kann
Defence has a justified reputation for reliability, making it an attractive choice for players with a preference for positional play. However, in recent years many new dangerous ideas have been discovered for White, which makes a
study of the theoretical main lines imperative for competitive players.
The Panov Attack against the Caro-Kann, 1 e4 c6 2 d4 d5 3 exd5 cxd5 4 c4, covered in this second volume in the series, leads to a rapid opening of lines and very lively piece play with prospects of a quick attack on the kingside, queenside or the
centre. Former world champion Anatoly Karpov selects and analyses the essential main lines that provide Black not only with security, but also with active play.
Price $21.95 - Buy
now!

Silman's Complete Endgame Course: From Beginner To Master
For
more than 100 years, the world's leading chess players and teachers have told their students to study the endgame. Now, for the first time, a revolutionary, richly instructive endgame book has been designed for players of all levels. Silman's
Complete Endgame Course, by famed writer and player Jeremy Silman, is the one and only endgame book you'll need as you move up the ladder from beginner to strong tournament player and finally to master.
Designed to "speak" to a player in a very personal way, Silman's book teaches the student everything he or she needs to know at his or her current rating level, and builds on that knowledge for each
subsequent phase of the player's development. Starting at the beginner's level, all basic mates are clearly and painstakingly explained. After that, the critical building blocks that form the endgame foundation for all tournament hopefuls and experienced
tournament competitors are explored in detail. Finally, advanced endgame secrets based on concepts rather than memorization are presented in a way that makes them easy to master.
$24.95 Price $22.95 - Buy
now!
|
Solution to
ICC Quiz #2662
submitted by Chessguy
1.Bb6+ Ke7; 2.Bc5+! Qxc5; 3.Qd7#
|

|
| 
|
Solution to
ICC Quiz #2726
submitted by claymore
1.Dxg7+ Kxg7; 2.Rf8#
|
|
|
|